Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help. verse 3 Psalm 146 (King James Bible)

Think about it what you are doing may be wonderful. But you don’t preach what you read from books or learned from other people without contradicting god I guess. Aren’t you a false preacher then?


20 reacties

  1. No Way Hosey, forget it Charlie Brown. All Xtian Biblical translations suck, for the simple reason: they all attempt to make a silk purse from a sows ear.

    The tohor middah רחום, as expressed in the 4th Middle Blessing within the Shemone Esri –

    ראה בענינו וריבה ריבנו וכו’ גואל ישראל

    This subcategory “king” of the 13 tohor middot, (each of these 13 middot wears its own unique crown), orally communicated to Moshe at Horev, functions as the expression and maturity of emotional development. The tuma reverse of the midda of mercy, expressions of Oedipus hubris. The Book of Ester teaches a strong mussar against arrogant anger. How extreme anger, combines with power, as played out in the Book of Ester. Maturation of strong passions defines how I learn the B’hag’s דאורייתא commandment of the Torah touching the mussar of Purim. A similar mussar within the Talmud teaches this same idea through the general terms, extreme anger directly compares to avoda zara.

    Oral Torah logic, contrasts with the Greeks philosophy: as expressed by both Plato and Aristotle, with it’s study of emotions. The Torah story: Aaron and Miriam, how they murmured against Moshe, serves as a specific which defines the subject of tuma from within the Torah itself. Another example: at the burning bush, one of the plagues revealed to Moshe – leprosy. Torah faith stands between the opposing poles of g’lut and geulla. Just as the latter expresses powerful emotions of national mourning and national joy, so too leprosy teaches this relationship ratio between strong emotions expressed through a personal human health disaster.

    The 1st commandment of the Sinai revelation directly refers back to the specific case of the redemption from Egyptian slavery. But slavery does not limit itself to physical bondage, but includes emotional slavery domination and mind control. The rivalry between the sons of Yaacov, which culminated in the enslavement of Yosef, and further expressed by the במדבר stories that emphasize the Yatzir HaRa within the hearts of Israel, to return back to Egypt – this tuma contrasts with the tohor middah – רחום.

    When the sages command that a ברכה requires שם ומלכות, the latter term of king directly refers back to the 13 middot דאורייתא. In effect, making a blessing calls in the Name of HaShem upon a specific comprehension of no less than one of the 13 Oral Torah middot. Keeping and doing halachic mitzvot requires שם ומלכות, [kingship – in the plural form], just as does pronouncing a blessing, both before and after eating food. The curse of g’lut:
    דתנן גיטין: המביא גט ממדינת הים, צריך שיאמר בפני נכתב ובפני נחתם. מ”ט? רבה אמר לפי שאין בקיאין לשמה

    The loss of wisdom to do mitzvot לשמה effectively defines the curse of g’lut. The sages within the Sha’s, they affix the root cause of g’lut to ‘hatred without cause’. But this concept, does it not most essentially hang upon a lack of emotional maturity among the Jewish people? The idea of hanging a mountain by a thread, this indispensable concept, it defines the Order of Damages in the Mishna. What ratio exists between words and emotions? This commentator refers to this question as: “Cave of many colors”. Primitive stone age man, these people directly compare to the enslavement of Israel by Egypt.

    Human cultures both express and “cook” the raw emotions which surge through our blood and minds. No man, irregardless of his talent and genius can stand upon the יסוד of ‘fear of heaven’, without wrestling with his emotional immaturity. The substance of mussar builds upon this fundamental יסוד. Theology, by stark contrast, totally ignores this most fundamental requirement of faith. In fact, what a person personally believes promotes raw uncooked passions. For this reason the brit mussar faith does not recognize, nor in any wise does it validate theology. Avoda zara cherishes and highlights theological belief systems, which center themselves upon the ego of I.

    How do emotions shape human cultures?. Human emotions, unlike a computer, do not stand divorced from our knowledge. Computers do not possess the ability to cry. Emotions shape how societies develop cultural, linguistic, even intergroup rivalry and conflict or ethnic misunderstandings. They directly influence and differentiate a national culture from all other cultures. Neither Xtianity nor Islam possess the means to understand either the T’NaCH or Talmud because these foreign aliens know nothing of the Jewish cultural impact, and how it shapes the perspective of the Cohen nation. Only a ger tzeddick, as a new creation, with a Torah blessing, can grasp the Torah brit faith.

    The New Testament attempt to understand the Torah, by referring to it as “the Law”, serves as a strong proof. Law does not encapsulate commandments. Rather, it reflects court room rulings which strives to compensate for damages inflicted or suffered. But Xtian believers remain blissfully unaware of the concept of lateral Common Law courtrooms. The latter codified Talmudic court rulings, they so most essentially define pharisaic law. Which Church anarchy so heartily despises with their tuma hypocrisy, criminally expressed throughout the last two kilo-years. The final outcome of this false messiah tuma – the Shoah itself.

    The soul and the afterlife, both learn from the brit cut between the pieces. How many children did Avram have at that time? Zero children. He cut an oath brit on the sworn oath that his future born seed would compare to the stars in the sky for its great multitudes. Now! What oath did Avram swear back to the Creator of the Universe whom father Avram called El Shaddai? El Shaddai, the Divine Name affixed to Chag Sukkot — the name of the Nefesh Yechidah.

    The halachic mitzva of kiddushin: what does a man acquire through kiddushin? If its the body of the woman, such an acquisition compares to buying a Hebrew slave – tohor; or acquiring the permission of a whore for sex – tumah. The mitzva of kiddushin an inference learned from Get – as in divorce. What does the Get return back to the divorcee? Her Nefesh O’lam Ha’Bah – – her future born children. The mitzva of kiddushin therefore stands upon the foundation of the Brit between the pieces. The oath which Avram placed upon El Shaddai to judge and witness – – – the faith commitment that El Shaddai would live within the hearts of the chosen Cohen Nation. This oath brit sworn by Avram stands eye to eye with the oath brit sworn by El Shaddai that the seed of Avram would compare to the stars in the heavens.

    Upon this יסוד rests the primary precondition known as avodat HaShem. The Torah explicitly warns the house of Aaron, never to attempt to do avodat HaShem while in a condition of tuma. Any attempt to perform avodat HaShem while breathing tuma spirits carries the Divine Decree of כרת – that person cuts himself off from the brit faith. The din of כרת, encourages the opposite response of t’shuva. King David experienced כרת as a consequence of his ערוה with Bat Sheva. The prophet Natan pronounced the Divine Din of Civil War throughout the generations of the House of David. Meaning that t’shuva for the crime of ערוה, which carries the din of כרת, equally applied to not just David himself, but to all his future born generations. This same כרת din equally applied to Adam HaReshon. Adam did not alone die. Rather 10 generations of Adam died during the floods in the days of Noach.

    The brit faith its cut upon the lives of a Man’s children. Each father, in his own right establishes the Creation story within his own brit seed. Herein explains the k’vanna of the opening blessing to acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven
    קדוש (previous generations) קדוש (present generations) קדוש (future generations) בכל יום תמיד מעשה בראשית.
    The language קדוש refers to the oath brit dedication of the Cohen nation unto HaShem. Directly comparable to the dedication of Yitzak upon the altar unto HaShem. A Torah korban dedicates, by means of swearing a Torah oath, life and not death, to HaShem. As a direct consequence tefilla stands in the place of korbanot. Tifilla stands in open contrast to prayer. It dedicates middot tohorot by which a Cohen Israel sanctifies his life walk before HaShem. Prayer, by stark contrast, Goyim make plead requests to their God(s) which primarily involve their own immediate personal lives.

    The Oral Torah stands upon the יסוד of tohor middot, both דאורייתא ודרבנן. Tohor middot serve as pronouns, as opposed to adjectives, unto the Name of HaShem. The 6 Yom Tov + Shabbot manorah, a Cohen Israel strives to kindle and light a tohor midda fire. By affixing a tohor middah unto one of the 6 Yom Tov (nefesh, ruach, neshama, chyyah, yeshida, nefesh kalli), affixed to a specific day of the week, face of the soul; a Cohen Israel strives to attach a tohor middah (defined as a consequence of Torah learning) unto a specif face of his soul. (The soul: directly refers to passing this tohor commitment unto his children). The mitzva of kiddushin most essentially entails bearing children and their education in Torah tohor middot. The name of the soul a Cohen Israel dedicates on Shabbot – Shalom. Hence Yidden traditionally greet one another on shabbot with — Shabbot Shalom.

    Neither Xtianity nor Islam possess any wisdom upon the defining concept of faith – tohor. The Cohen Israel dietary laws, for example, do not prohibit the consumption of delicious foods because those animals qualify as “unclean”. Tuma does not mean “unclean”. Both opposing Torah concepts – tohor & tuma – refer to spirits breathing within our hearts. The Torah dietary laws apply strictly and only to the Cohen Israel brit people alone. Irregardless that the Catholic church dresses up as priests, similar to Islam’s slaughter of halal meat attempts to duplicate rabbinic kashrut laws, neither this nor that qualify as part of the brit Cohen nation. Both alien religions worship foreign Gods.

    Geliked door 2 people

      • My response to your valid question. Open the Book of Kings. And ask yourself, why does this Book open with Natan and Bat Sheva scheming how to save their necks? Now jump to the son of Solomon traveling to Sh’Cem to be recognized as the son of Solomon king over Yechuda and Israel. What common denominator connects these two independent stories? Answer: Just as king Solomon did not heed the council which Natan the Prophet advised both king David and the new king Solomon — so too the son of Solomon did not heed the advise which his elder advisors suggested in speaking softly to the request to reduce taxation upon the Tribes!

        The prophet Natan gave king David a very powerful mussar. G-d never commanded any leader of Israel to build a house of wood and stone – that’s idolatry. What did Natan base his advise to the king upon? The last mitzva which Moshe the prophet strove to accomplish before he passed away on the other side of the Jordan river! Moshe established not only the 3 cities of refuge on the other side of the Jordan river, but even more important – he established the small Sanhedrin courts!!!!!!

        These courts had a Cohen has their Nasi/head of court. Before the Cohen Nasi could impose a death sentence, he had a Torah obligation to offer a korban sacrifice upon the altar that each of these cities of refuge possessed. Why? It learns from the new moon system of communications. Whenever the new moon occurred, people would lite signal fires upon the hills to communicate the arrival of the new moon to Jewish communities in both Judea and abroad. A korban sacrifice makes a huge amount of smoke.

        A small Sanhedrin court Cohen nasi had to offer a korban upon the city of refuge private altar to communicate that the Court had reached its verdict without acceptance of any bribe that perverts the judgement of the Court. The cohen nasi in order to do “avodat HaShem”, specifically to carry out justice, (justice justice pursue), the cohen of the court had to publicly prove that he and the Sanhedrin court did this public service of justice in a state of tohora. Therefore the requirement placed upon the Sanhedrin court to offer up a korban sacrifice prior to the execution of the criminal for murder.

        The most essential and important part of the 2nd Temple – the Court of Hewn-Stone – the seat of the Great Sanhedrin “Federal Court” of 71 judges. King Solomon by stark contrast, the Book of Kings makes satire upon the “wisdom” of Solomon the “most wise”, through the story of the 2 prostitutes who approached the king’s court requesting justice! King Solomon failed to establish the Great Sanhedrin Court. Herein defines the advise the prophet Natan advised by king David and Solomon. Solomon ignored this advise just as his son would likewise ignore the advise given by the elder servants of king Solomon.

        Geliked door 1 persoon

  2. thank you for your reaction, i realy have to read a couple of times to see if i can understand what you are saying.
    at this point i am still in research, and i find the statement of Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.,
    very interesting,

    so my question to you is can you say or explain me if the books you have learnd from has a message that says the same as that

    in my simple words? do not trust man

    again thank you for your respons i’m a man who wants to learn and see for myself

    Geliked door 1 persoon

    • i’m so sorry for being such a simple man, and your long awnser is beautyfull, and i thank you for that.
      is it posible to awnser simple for me?
      im’ sorry for my stuppidety so again,

      is written in the Thora for example that god says “do not trust man” in any way ?

      and is it almoste time for the 3e temple ?

      i got a other question.

      will the 3e temple be build in the city of David where the water source start ?

      thank you so much for reaction


      • In the Holy Writings of the T’NaCH it states:
        תהלים קיח:ח טוה לחסות הה’ מבטח באדם
        To understand Psalms, you have to understand the cultural contexts that inspired them. King David, tried and failed to establish the Torah as the Written Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes. “Better to “trust” in HaShem than to trust in Man.” This idea dates back to the sin of the Golden Calf. 40 days after Moshe ascended Mount Sinai to receive the rest of the Torah?

        [There never occurred 10 Commandments! The mussar of the 10 Commandment editing of the Torah serves to link the revelation of the Torah at Sinai with the 10 plagues whereby Israel departed from Egyptian enslavement. After the opening first 2 Commandments at Sinai, all the people of Israel – in a state of absolute terror – demanded that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah revelation — lest they die. At the time of the Golden Calf, Israel had accepted only the first 2 Commandments at Sinai. The Midrash explains the event of the Golden Calf criminal activities of the slaves fresh out of Egypt. After 40 days a mob murdered the Great Sanhedrin judges — all except for Aaron! They demanded thereafter: “Moshe has died. Who will teach us the rest of the Torah, which we swore an oath “נעשה ונשמע” to do and hear? Moshe descended from Sinai and broke the 2 commandments written on the 2 tablets. He returned thereafter and once more ascended Sinai and after another 40 day wait received the “Oral Torah” revelation of logic which he thereafter derived his famous 611 commentary which he made upon the 2 Commandment revelation at Sinai 81 days earlier.]

        During the period of the 2nd Temple, under the leadership of Judah Maccabee and his family of Cohonim, for the first time since the king of Babylon destroyed the monarchy of David, the descendant survivors of that fallen kingdom, they re-established national Independence! The Chag Hanukkah commemorates this fantastic event.

        [Aristotle served as the advisor to Alexander the Great when that general conquered the Persian empire. Upon Alexanders’ death, his generals divided his great empire among themselves; they established kingdoms. By the time of the Maccabee revolt the Syrian Greek kingdom ruled Judea. In the blessing after a meal, there it refers to the Syrian Greeks as wicked b/c that kingdom attempted to expunge the Torah from the minds of the Jewish people. Which Torah did the Greek Syrian king attempt to force Israel to abandon? The Oral Torah logic system format, which Moshe the prophet received at Mount “Horev” 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the people declared to Aaron that Moshe had died! Chag Hanukkah Yechudim to this day light the lights of Hanukkah. To remember the dedication to only interpret the Written Torah with the Oral Torah logic system which Moshe the prophet heard at “Horev” on Yom Kippor, 40 days after the golden calf.]

        Therefore based upon this cultural context Psalm 118:8 means trust in the Oral Torah revelation which Moshe the prophet received, than trust the logic of Man – referring to the ancient Greek philosophers of Aristotle and Plato. All generations and societies require logic. The Dark Ages of Xtian Europe merit this name b/c the church criminally banned the study of Greek knowledge from about 400 CE to approximately 900 CE! Spanish Jewry almost totally, if not totally embraced the rediscovery of the ancient Greek philosophies that the Arab invaders of Spain published. The rediscovery of Greek philosophy would result in another Jewish Civil War lead by assimilationist rabbis, the most famous being the Rambam himself. This tragic Civil War would witness a huge population transfer of Jews fleeing from Western European countries unto Eastern European countries.


      • A rabbi of the period of Reshon scholars (900 CE to 1400 CE) the רד”ק he wrote in his commentary: That a man who abandons reliance upon the Oral Torah to interpret the Written Torah Constitution, that this man uproots the Torah faith of Horev.

        Geliked door 1 persoon

      • i don’t, untill now i don’t trust anything,ot anybody not even myself or my logic,
        but i’m always open for interesting conversations to learn for myself


      • A Torah oath brit alliance – Life and Death – hang upon the scales of Judgement. The servant of Avraham, his name Eliezar, he met the family of Avraham who lived in Iraq. Through his half sister Sarah – through their shared father – but Sarah’s mother – not related to Avraham’s mother. From here the sages interpreted the intent/k’vanna of the Torah that the mother determines the Jewishness of the all new born children for all generations. This judgement ruling has received challenge, primarily the Tzeddukim sons of Aaron. They base the logic of their opposition upon the Torah which commands, that only the sons of Aaron can do avodat HaShem in the service of korbanot dedications. The Torah refers to Klall Yisroel as the nation of Cohonim. Therefore unto this day, the Reform Judaism opposition argues that the father determines the Jewishness of all new born children.

        The sages answer the challenge made by the Tzeddukim cohonim by teaching the Torah commandment-mussar which instructs Avram to heed the command of Sarah to expel both Ishmael together with his mother. That only Yitzak, her son, would inherit the oath brit Cohen alliance. The logic of the Tzeddukim collapsed on this refutation. The sages who compiled the Gemara made upon all 6 Orders of the Mishna, established the common law legal style of difficulty/answer – bringing a close precedent from any and all of the other 6 Orders of the Mishna; which includes the Order that the current Mishna exists therein. פשיטה – obvious.

        The style of the servant Eliezar before the family living in Iraq: the father, mother, and eldest brother of Rebekka, comes to teach the mussar of cutting a brit. A brit alliance, by definition excludes the enemy. פשיטה – obvious. The oath brit which Avraham made his servant Eliezar to swear: that he would never make a קידושין oath brit alliance with any of the sons of Canaan.

        This judicial ruling Avraham made from Lot. The Book of Ruth, the Nasi of the Court – Boaz – interpreted the Torah prohibition not to cut a Torah alliance with the children of Lot: Moav and Ammon; consequent to Balak who hired Bil’am – to curse Israel. Bil’am, a descendent of La’van, profaned the sworn oath brit alliance which Yaacov and La’van swore to cement the alliance which the servant Eliezar swore through a Torah oath unto Avraham – to travel to the family of Avraham, who live in Iraq, and to cut an oath brit alliance with members of Avraham’s immediate family. The קידושין [Jewish chuppah wedding] of this union did not violate the כרת din of ערוה that the daughters of Lot profaned. The oath brit alliance of the children of Adam and Noach rests upon the four legs which prohibit acts of theft, oppression, ערוה, and courtroom injustice. The Nasi Boaz ruled that the daughters of Lot, that the Torah prohibition did not apply to them. The enemy curse applied only to the sons of Lot. The Tzeddukim sons of Aaron the Cohen could not logically respond to this difficulty from the Torah. The Sages, also more popularly known by Greek New Testament translation – as the pharisees.

        The tohor middah חנון affixes to the 5th middle blessing of the Shemone Esri רפאנו ה’ ונרפא. A Torah oath brit – cut upon Life or Death/Blessing or Curse. The case/din of the story of how the servant of Avraham – Eliezar cut an oath brit alliance with the family of Avraham living in Iraq logicly compares to the famine in the days of Ahav. The prophet Eliyyahu judged king Ahav as a wicked king, who like Yerov’am, abandoned the oath brit alliance that establishes the Torah as the Written Constitution of the Tribal oath brit Republic alliance. In similar logic analysis by making a precedent comparison, Bil’am – the descendant of L’van – profaned the oath brit alliance cut between Yaacov and La’van.

        King Sh’lomo in equal measure violated and profaned the oath brit Republic alliance when he failed to set, and establish the authority of the Great Sanhedrin lateral common law court system. Justice functions as the נמשל to the משל of rain fall in its proper season. Ahav assimilated and embraced foreign cultures and customs; he decreed the abandonment of the Torah Constitution. The משל of famine – caused by no rain – the נמשל – foreign enemy troops scale the walls of Jerusalem and brutally conquer the nation’s Capital.

        Hitler in a point of comparison, he lacked the clarity of leadership to focus the invasion of the USSR with the capture of Moscow. Napoleon captured Moscow and likewise suffered total defeat in war. A basic strategy of total war, to conquer the Capital City of the enemy; meaning capture its Government leaders. Napoleon’s army failed to defeat the Czar of Russia, even though it physicky – militarily temporarily occupied Russia’s Capital city – Moscow.


  3. The Torah employs a learning technique called משל\נמשל Parable and interpretation of that parable. The language of water functions as a משל. The Torah teaches this משל by contrasting the land of Israel from the land of Egypt whose economy depends upon the Nile river. All civilizations based their economies upon agriculture. Hence the Torah permitted slave labor. The Industrial revolution of the early 19th Century did not exist in the days of neither the T’NaCH nor Talmud. To understand ancient texts fundamentally requires a strong study and comprehension of the cultural norms which shaped public opinions. Superimposing present day cultural norms upon ancient societies compares to acceptance of brides by judges hearing a case before their Court!

    The נמשל of the water משל – – – justice by and through the lateral common law Torah Courts.


    • The 6 Orders of the Mishna all employ the Case/Rule style. That’s Common Law. The Gemara commentary upon the Mishna, the Talmud, likewise employs a Difficulty/Answer style; meaning the sages would search for legal precedents from all the 6 Orders of the Mishna to understand a current case before the Court. Comparing earlier precedent Cases with later Court Cases requires logic, specifically Oral Torah logic. The Rambam abandoned this Hanukkah dedication … Golden Calf dedication … he relied upon Aristotles’ logic format. The Zohar, another product of assimilated Spanish rabbis, by contrast – that work relied upon Plato’s logic. The 10 Sefirot emanations idea spouts from Plato’s theory of logic.

      Geliked door 1 persoon

      • In the late 19th Century Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, he developed a dialectic logic that shapes present day computer programmers Yes/No logic. This logic system challenged the Church dominated logic based upon ancient Greek philosophy. Goethe, a contemporary of Hegel, Karl Marx, Friedrich Nitzsche, and many others embraced or strongly influenced by Hegels dialectics of logic. Perhaps comparable to the revolution that Keynesian economics, which based itself upon a Central Bank; as opposed by the free banking {think of Hong Kong under the British protectorate} system of Adam Smith. Jefferson would oppose Hamilton on this precise issue. Andrew Jackson would close the 2nd National Bank while Woodrow Wilson would re-establish the 3rd Central Bank, known by the name Federal Reserve.

        Geliked door 1 persoon

      • i tought the Federal Reserve is and has nothing to do with the goverment
        i tought the Federal Reserve is a private owned bank that has a sort of enslaved us all with dept ? but that is a other story i looked into
        and amazing that you put somuch time in awnsering me with explanations thank you

        Geliked door 1 persoon

      • Cooking or maturing ones’ personal emotions, by the way I learn, the משל of “Cave of Many Colors” attempts to describe development of the emotional mind. Or as my wife Karen calls it “testosterone poisoning”. LOL

        Geliked door 1 persoon

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Google photo

Je reageert onder je Google account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )


Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s